The Best Grills and BBQs
Gas, charcoal or pellet — and the build details that decide longevity.
Time to cook, flavour differences that survive a blind test, and running costs.
By Naomi Park, Kitchen Editor · Published August 6, 2026 · 2 min read

Photograph: Creative Vix / StockSnap
Hearthline is editorially independent. When you buy through links on this page we may earn a commission, which funds our testing. It never changes what we recommend or how we score. How we make money.
The flavour question is real but narrower than people claim. In our blind tests, tasters reliably identified charcoal on slow-cooked cuts and could not distinguish it on quick-cooked chicken breast or vegetables.
Gas averaged 14 minutes; charcoal 34 including lighting and settling. That gap decides how often each gets used.
Charcoal reached higher grate temperatures, which matters for a proper crust on steak and flatbread.
Per session, gas was cheaper. Lumpwood charcoal for a long cook cost roughly twice a gas equivalent.
Gas: brush the grates. Charcoal: ash management every session. Small difference, repeated fifty times a year.
The verdict
Gas wins on weeknights: fifteen minutes from decision to food and precise control. Charcoal wins on flavour for anything cooked over 20 minutes, and on searing heat. If you grill more than twice a week, gas is the one that gets used.
Methodology
Every product here was tested in a working home against standardised tasks. Scores are the mean of five measured criteria and are never adjusted for commercial reasons. How we test · How we review.
The Home Brief
Several mornings a week. No filler, no fake urgency, unsubscribe in one click.
Gas, charcoal or pellet — and the build details that decide longevity.
The four-part sequence that turns a patch of paving into a room you actually use.
We ran both on the same lawn for a season. The answer depends on shape more than size.
We cut the same three lawns weekly for a season and logged runtime, cut quality and clipping distribution.